|
1
|
- Martha A. Feldman, RAC
- Drug & Device Development Co., Inc.
- AMDM Conference, San Jose CA
- September 14, 2006
|
|
2
|
- Possible claims for IVD in managing patient therapeutics
- Types of clinical studies for demonstrating safety and effectiveness for
each of the claims
- FDA Letter on Personalized Medicine
- Warning Letters to Manufacturers
- Marketing without FDA clearance or approval
- Marketing as an ASR, but exceeding regulations
|
|
3
|
- Drugs of Abuse
- Tumor markers
- Therapeutic levels
- Disease Detection
- Microbial Detection
- Detection of Genetic or Mutagenic Factors
- Clinical chemistries and hematological parameters
- Bioterrorism and Public Health
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Indication for Use:
- Determine drug levels of legal and illegal drugs
- Practical applications (i.e., management of patient therapeutics)
- Manage therapeutic levels of legally prescribed drugs that have
potential for abuse
- Assess response to drug treatment programs
|
|
6
|
- Risks
- Clinical
- Incorrect treatment (to counteract false high readings)
- Insufficient treatment given (false low readings)
- Social
- Inaccurate results which show use of illegal drug ingestion – loss of
respect, loss of job, expelled from school, jail time
|
|
7
|
- Illegal
- marijuana, cocaine, opiates (including heroin), amphetamines (including
Ecstasy or MDMA), and PCP (angel dust).
- Prescription
- codeine or other painkillers
- amphetamines
NOTE: all amphetamine results should be considered carefully,
even those from the laboratory. Some over-the-counter medications contain
amphetamines that cannot be distinguished from illegally-abused
amphetamines.
|
|
8
|
- Guidance for Labeling for Over-the Counter Sample Collection Systems for
Drugs of Abuse Testing www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/1359.pdf
- Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Premarket Submission and
Labeling recommendations for Drugs of Abuse Screening Tests www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/152.pdf
|
|
9
|
- Home Use Test Kits (One Step Method) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/homeuse-drug-collection.html
- Home Use Tests (Two-Step Method) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/homeuse-drug-2step.html
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Indications for use
- Screening
- Monitoring disease progression
- Monitoring disease recurrence
- Assessing efficacy of treatment
- Prognosing disease
- Practical applicability
- Timely intervention with medicine or surgery
|
|
12
|
- Examples
- Alpha feto-protein L 3% for hepatocarcinoma
- Bladder cancer antigen
- Breast cancer receptors
- HPV assays
|
|
13
|
- Risks of inaccurate results
- Mismanagement of therapy: giving potentially toxic medicines,
performing unnecessary surgery or not administering/intervening when
needed
- Not detecting presence of antigen in detecting presence or recurrence
of disease
|
|
14
|
- Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: AFP-L3% Immunological test
systems, October 4, 2005
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
- Indications for Use
- Ensuring drugs levels are in therapeutic range
- Assessing if adverse events may be due to over-dosage
- Practical applications
- Levels of anticoagulants prior to and during surgery
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- FDA Reminders For Falsely Elevated Glucose Readings From Use of
Inappropriate Test Method http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/news/glucosefalse.html
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff 510(k) Submissions for Coagulation
Instruments http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1223.html
|
|
19
|
- Guidance for Industry Document for Special Controls for
Erythropoietin Assay Premarket
Notifications [510(k)s] http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/2241.html
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Indications for use
- Aid in diagnosis
- Detection of disease
- Monitor progression
- Detect recurrence
- Differentiation between diseases
- Practical applications
- Congestive heart failure (CHF)
- Alzheimer’s disease
- Diabetes
|
|
22
|
- Examples
- Alzheimer’s Disease: Nymox Urine NTP kit (Panel voted against approval
15 July 05)
- CHF:
- β-Type Natriuretic Peptide (30 Nov 2000)
- C-Reactive Protein
- Fibrin monomer paracoagulation test: Differential diagnosis between
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and primary fibrinolysis
|
|
23
|
- Risks of poor performance
- False negative:
- inadequate or no treatment, or
- wrong treatment based upon erroneous results
- False positive:
- Unneeded treatment given
- May delay giving correct treatment for true cause of signs and
symptoms
- Additional, unnecessary additional tests conducted
|
|
24
|
- FDA Approves New Laboratory Test To Detect Human Infections With Avian
Influenza A/H5 Viruses http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2006pres/20060203.html
- Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff
- Class II Special Controls Guidance Document:
Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 Serological Assays
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1305.html
|
|
25
|
- Immunology Devices Panel Meeting - July 15, 2005 (NTP for Alzheimer’s
Disease) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/panel/summary/immun-071505.html
- Final Guidance for Industry and FDA Reviewers - Class II Special Control
Guidance Document for B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Premarket Notifications
(for CHF) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/guidance/1072.html
|
|
26
|
- Class II Special Controls Guidance Document:
AFP-L3% Immunological Test Systems http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1570.html
- In Vitro Diagnostic Fibrin Monomer Paracoagulation Test http://www.fda.giv/cdrh/ode/2242.html
- Review Criteria for Assessment of Laboratory Tests for the Detection of
Antibodies to Heliobacter pylori (17 Sept 92)
|
|
27
|
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Review Criteria for Assessment of
C Reactive Protein (CRP), High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP)
and Cardiac C-Reactive Protein (cCRP) Assays http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1246.html
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Indications for Use
- Described in 21 CFR 866, Subparts B, C, D
- Does not cover screening blood and plasma donors (covered by CBER)
- Practical Applications
- Specific recommendations for detection of particular microbial
pathogens are not given in Guidance Document
|
|
30
|
- Risks of poor performance
- Failure to perform or error in interpretation of results can lead to
improper patient management, or Inappropriate public health response
- False negative could lead to clinical misdiagnosis, withholding
appropriate treatment and not instituting prevention and/or control
efforts in the case of a transmissible disease.
- Missed diagnoses in pregnant women can lead to congenital infections in
the newborn
- False positive can lead to potentially toxic treatment, social and
psychological devastation, costly additional tests, quarantine, etc.
|
|
31
|
- Nucleic Acid Based In Vitro Diagnostic Devices for Detection of
Microbial Pathogens - Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff (8 Dec
05) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1560.html
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
- Indication for Use
- Detection of analytes in material or fetal media
- Detection of a mutation in patients
- Practical applications
- Risk assessment for developing fetus
- Managing therapeutic measurements in patients with known mutations
|
|
34
|
- Examples:
- Alpha-fetoprotein for detection of neural tube defect
- Cystic Fibrosis
|
|
35
|
- Risks of poor performance
- Genetic
- Unwarranted termination of pregnancy
- Inaccurate risk assessment for fetus
- Mutation
- Inappropriate therapeutic intervention
- Unaware of potential susceptibility; unprepared for adverse response
to drug
|
|
36
|
- Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Pharmacogenetic Tests and
Genetic Tests for Heritable Markers (9 Feb 06) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1549.html
- FDA Approves First DNA-based Test
to Detect Cystic Fibrosis (May 9,
2005) http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2005/NEW01178.html
|
|
37
|
- Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Drug Metabolizing Enzyme
Genotyping System (10 Mar 05) http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1551.html
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
- Indications for use
- Determine levels of various biochemical parameters
- Detection of antibodies to viral agents
- Practical applications
- Assess level of hypoxia
- Diagnose acidosis
- Monitor electrolytes
|
|
40
|
- Examples
- Biocarbonate/Carbon dioxide test system
- Serum nitrogen levels
- Serum sodium levels
- Blood glucose levels
- Serum potassium levels
|
|
41
|
- Risks of poor performance
- False low and false high results could mean the administration of the
wrong medicine, fluids, chemicals, etc. and/or the inappropriate
amounts
- Failure to provide accurate results could mean missing a trend that,
left untreated, would significantly affect patient outcome.
|
|
42
|
- Guidance for Industry – In Vitro Diagnostic Sodium Test System http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/75.html
- Guidance for Industry – In Vitro Diagnostic Urea Nitrogen Test System http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/72.html
- Guidance for Industry – In Vitro Diagnostic Chloride Test System http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/73.html
|
|
43
|
- Guidance for Industry – In Vitro Diagnostic Creatinine Test System http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/74.html
- Guidance for Industry – In Vitro Diagnostic Glucose Test System http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/76.html
- Guidance for Industry – In Vitro Diagnostic Potassium Test System
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/77.html
|
|
44
|
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: 510(k) Submissions for Coagulation
Instruments http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1223.html
- Review Criteria for In Vitro Diagnostic Devices for the Detection of IgM
Antibodies to Viral Agents (August, 1992)
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
- Indication for Use
- Detection of presence of noxious materials (pathogens, chemical or
infectious agents) in blood, urine, other body fluids or tissues that
may have a significant impact on public health
- Detection of sexually transmitted diseases
- Practical applications
- Isolating affected people to prevent spread
- Identifying noxious agents to be able to initiate therapy
- Rapid, accurate, identification of the source of a public health
problem
|
|
47
|
- Avian Flu A/H5 Viruses (3 Feb 06 notice)
- Hepatitis
- HIV
- Anthrax
- Mad Cow Disease (CJ Syndrome)
- Chlamydia, Syphilis, Gonorrhea
- Tuberculosis
|
|
48
|
- Risks of poor performance
- Inaccurate results may results in no, inadequate or wrong treatment by
misidentifying noxious agent or providing inaccurate levels
- False negative results may mean infected or contaminated persons may be
unwittingly transmitting noxious agent to others
- False positive may cause panic, unnecessary treatment, additional
testing
|
|
49
|
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - In Vitro Diagnostic Devices to
Detect Influenza A Viruses: Labeling and Regulatory Path http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1594.html
- Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Class II Special Controls Guidance
Document: Hepatitis A Virus Serological Assays http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1536.html
|
|
50
|
- Review Criteria for Assessment of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices for Direct
Detection of Chlamydia in Clinical Specimens, Jan. 1992
- Review Criteria for Devices Intended for the Detection of Hepatitis B
“e” Antigen and Antibody to HBe (Dec., 1991)
- Review Criteria for Assessment of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices for Direct
Detection of Mycobacterium SPP. (28 Deb 94)
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
- Required (may need an IDE)
- Guidance document says so
- Unresolved issues in preclinical studies
- Safety concerns
- Demonstration of clinical utility (FDA request)
- Predicate product submission contained clinical data
- Desired
- Feasibility; proof of concept
- Marketing evaluation; fundraising purposes
|
|
53
|
- FD&C Act §513 (a)(1), (b) and (c)
- Class I - general controls
- Class II - general controls + special controls
- Class III - general controls + special controls + premarket approval
|
|
54
|
- Registration
- Device Listing
- Labeling
- Notification and Other Remedies
- Quality System Regulation
|
|
55
|
- Class I and II: The 510(k): demonstrate substantial equivalence -
comparison study; no superiority
- Class III: Premarket Approval Application (PMA): demonstrate safety and
effectiveness; rigorous study design, e.g., randomized, double-blinded,
prospective, well-controlled
- Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE): demonstrate safety only; £ 4000 cases/year (compare to drugs
- £ 200,000)
|
|
56
|
- Risk level of device: SR or NSR
- Risk level of study: (e.g., NSR device in SR situation)
- IDE required or not
- Environment limitations for use of device
- Location where device is being used
- Ethical issues specific for devices
- Training in use of device (VERY IMPORTANT!)
|
|
57
|
- Temperature
- Humidity
- Pressure (i.e., altitude)
- Electromagnetic Interference
- Sterility requirements
- Particulate matter in atmosphere
- Space (i.e., size for bedside, field use)
|
|
58
|
- Hospital in-patient (including, OR, ER, hospital labs)
- Hospital - outpatient; clinician’s private office
- Field hospitals (e.g., battlefields, natural disasters)
- On-site medical care (e.g., accidents, sporting events, riots)
- Home use (OTC versus prescription; professional [e.g., visiting nurse],
caregiver, patient self-testing)
|
|
59
|
- Investigational diagnostic devices used for patient management
- Training clinical personnel in use of IVD; ongoing validation of
training – new personnel, upgrades
- Prevention of, or delay in, giving standard treatment because of
possible erroneous results from the IVD
- Giving unnecessary treatment because of possible erroneous results from
the IVD
- Just because you can test for something does not mean that you should!
|
|
60
|
- Use of company’s own stored, leftover samples from a previous study for
a new IVD study (different analyte)
- Use of a repository’s samples, i.e., long term storage, so no consent
available or possible
- Informing subjects of results from an investigational IVD (i.e., if the
company believes that the IVD is better than the gold standard)
|
|
61
|
- Guidance on Informed Consent for In Vitro Diagnostic Device Studies
Using Leftover Human Specimens that are Not Individually Identifiable -
Guidance for Sponsors, Institutional Review Boards, Clinical
Investigators and FDA Staff http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1588.html
- Points to Consider in the Collection of Data in Support of In Vitro
Device Submissions for 510(k) Clearance http://www.fda/cdrh/ode/95.pdf
|
|
62
|
- http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/news.html
|
|
63
|
- Examples:
- Third Wave technology: Invader UGTA1A Assay: detecting variations in a
gene that affects how certain drugs are broken down and cleared by the
body, e.g. irinotecan for treatment of colorectal cancer
- Roche AmpliChip: to individualize dosage of antidepressants,
antipsychotics, beta-blockers and some chemotherapy drugs
- TRUGENE HIV-1 Genotyping Kit: detect variations in the genome of the
HIV that make the virus resistant to some anti-retroviral drugs
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
- Warning Letter to Tepnel Diagnostics Ltd. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/letters/092605-tepnel.html
for detections of genetic-based diseases such as cystic fibrosis and
cardiovascular diseases (26Aug 05)
- Warning Letter to Access Genetics http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/letters/080105-access.html for several tests, e.g., Thrombophilia
Tests (Factor 5 Leiden, Factor 2 Prothrombin, MTHFR), Human
Papillomavirus (HPV), Chlamydia & Gonorrhea PAP and Cystic Fibrosis
|
|
66
|
- Letter to Nanogen Corporation http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/letters/081105-nanogen.html
(11Aug 05)
|
|
67
|
- Martha A. Feldman
- (425)861-8262
- mfeldman@druganddevice.com
|