|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Currently, only ~ 1% of genetic tests available to clinicians are FDA
cleared or approved
- FDA is concerned that commercially distributed genetic tests are
reliable and that patients and health care professionals understand both
the value and the limitations of such testing
|
|
3
|
- Intended to measure and sort multiple signals generated by an assay from
a clinical sample
- Instrumentation is used with a specific assay to measure multiple
similar analytes that establish a single indicator to aid in diagnosis
- Device includes:
- signal reader unit, →
raw data storage mechanisms
- integrated reagent handling, →
data acquisition
- hybridization, washing, →
software to process signal
- dedicated instrument control,
- other hardware components.
|
|
4
|
- Guidance addresses multiplex tests that measure multiple similar
analytes that establish a single indicator to aid in diagnosis:
- SNPs patient’s genotype
- multiple alleles
- Instrumentation could aid in clinical applications:
- screening or diagnosis of
disease
- drug selection and dosing
- patient management
- assessment of disease
progression and regression
|
|
5
|
- A specific multiplex assay or test that is intended to be run on
instrumentation for clinical multiplex test systems is considered a separate
device
- This guidance document does not address performance characteristics for
such an assay
|
|
6
|
- Risk to Health
- Inaccurate or absent results due to failure of instrumentation
components (sections 7, 9)
- Inaccurate results due to failure of data management and database
software (section 8)
|
|
7
|
- Intended Use
- Claims in the intended use determine the type of review that is
necessary -
- (often independent of the technology or assay format)
- Separate submissions for multiple intended uses
- (e.g., a device that genotypes multiple genes)
- Carefully define the intended use population(s)
- (e.g., some alleles/genotypes may have low prevalence in certain pops -
many patients may need to be tested for statistical significance)
|
|
8
|
- Device Description
- Describe additional instrument components provided, or recommended for
use, and their function in the system
- How the instrument is designed to carry out its functions related to
amplification, hybridization, or signal detection
- The sample type(s) that may be run on the instrumentation
- Types of output generated by the instrumentation and system parameters
(e.g., reading ranges)
- Related peer-reviewed literature references (if applicable)
|
|
9
|
- Analytical performance
- Precision (reproducibility)
- characterize reproducibility using well-characterized sample + positive
and negative control assays
- assess overall instrumentation performance
- justify statistically sample size for reproducibility study
- ≥ 2 operators and ≥ 3 instruments in the study
- masked samples (results unknown to operators)
- report between-assay, between-scan, between-instrument,
between-operator, or other evaluations, as appropriate
|
|
10
|
- Analytical performance
- Recommend to report:
- Coefficients of variation (CV) with CI for between- instruments,
operators, device lots, and other evaluations, as appropriate
- Pairwise correlation coefficients, scatter plots, and ANOVA analysis of
data from all relevant elements of the reproducibility study
- Any bias observe during reproducibility studies and explanation to
account for observed bias
|
|
11
|
- Analytical performance
- Method Comparison:
- evaluate performance of your instrumentation against predicate device (
% agreement)
- NO predicate available compare performance to “gold standard” method
- Calibration:
- develop and recommend calibration program/maintenance schedule for each
portion of the instrumentation
|
|
12
|
- Software
- Fully describe software design
- Do not include software utilities that support uses beyond your assay
- consider privacy and security issues in your design.
- Submit hazard analysis based on impact of any failure of subsystem
components
- signal detection and analysis, data storage, system communications and
cybersecurity
- Complete verification and validation (V&V) activities
|
|
13
|
- Intended to test DNA to identify presence/absence of human genotypic
markers encoding DME
- Device is used an aid to determine:
- treatment choice
- individualizing treatment dose
for therapeutics
|
|
14
|
- Risk to Health
- Failure to correctly identify genotype encoding for a DME (sections 7,8,
and 9)
- Failure to properly interpret genotyping results (section 10)
|
|
15
|
- Intended Use
- Specify genotype(s) the test is intended to detect
- General clinical utility of detecting the genotype
- Specific populations to which the test is targeted
- Specify the drug metabolizing enzyme encoded by the genotype
- (tests with multiple intended uses (e.g., multiple DME’s): When separate studies are needed to
support the multiple intended uses, submit separate 510(k) applications
for each intended use)
|
|
16
|
- Performance Characteristics
- Description of samples used in testing (including types of samples,
preparation or origin, number of samples and how the samples
specifically represent your intended use samples).
- Descriptions of the statistical methods you used.
- Explanations, if there were any deviations from your protocol.
|
|
17
|
- Performance Characteristics
- Preanalytical Factors
- Critical for high-quality genetic tests
- If extraction and preparation of DNA for testing is provided (validate
each step, reproducibility)
- Not DNA reagents provided -> present specifications for quality of
the assay input DNA
|
|
18
|
- Performance Characteristics
- Quality Control
- Include both positive and negative controls (controls should reflect
sample composition/DNA concentration
- Controls should show that all steps/critical reactions have proceeded
properly and without contamination or cross-hybridization
|
|
19
|
- Analytical performance
- Precision (reproducibility)
- Accuracy
- Limit of Detection
- Traceability
- Potential Interferences
|
|
20
|
- Analytical performance
- Precision (Reproducibility) (EP5-A/EP12-A)
- characterize intra- and inter-assay reproducibility
- samples used in reproducibility testing are processed from “real”
samples (e.g. whole blood, buccal swabs, or others) at test site
(processing should mimics procedure recommended in the test)
- ≥3 sites with multiple operators at each site. Operators should reflect potential
users of the assay (education and experience)
- multiple product lots, and multiple instruments (if instruments are
part of the test system)
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- Limit of Detection
- Lowest (and highest) concentration of input sample that yields a
reliable and accurate result
- Potential Interferences
- Endogenous and exogenous common substances
- Commonly prescribed drugs
- Similar molecules
- Sample preparation / conditions
- Effect of excess sample or limiting sample
|
|
23
|
- Software:
- Total system validation
- Describe any algorithms or cutoffs used to determine results
- Database integrity
- Cyber-security
- Follow the FDA guidance for premarket submission requirements for
devices containing software
- Follow the FDA guidance for off-the-shelf software
|
|
24
|
- Clinical performance – clinical validity
- Device must have a clinical indication/clinical utility
- May be based on:
- Existing clinical data
- New clinical trial data
- Review of information in the literature
- Current clinical knowledge
|
|
25
|
- When clinical studies are needed to show clinical utility:
- Prospective clinical studies
- Retrospective validation
- Banked samples from prior clinical studies
- Samples should be stored under optimal conditions
- Bridging studies may be done if a platform change or device change is
necessary after clinical validation
|
|
26
|
|