Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
What Works
  • Location, location, location
  • Patient safety work is geographically connected
  • Ad hoc meetings can be done in real time
  • Consults are up-close and personal
  • Work is unavoidably intermingled
3
What Works
  • Organizational ownership
  • Product level experts do care about what happens
  • Understand quickly and immediately the problems being seen post market
  • Positioned to ask the right questions to  resolve the issue
  • Learn from questions
4
OIVD Work Audit
  • Jan 20 to Feb 28, 2006
  • 55 pre/post market meetings
5
OIVD Work Audit
  • HHE’s – 17
  • PMA issues – 14 (5 technical review; 9 AIP issues)
  • Compliance letters – 7
  • MDR reports – 7
  • Other – labeling, import issues -- 10
6
Organizational Ownership -- subject specific work
  • Flu problem – Roxanne Shively, Claudia Gaffey
  • Women’s health problem – Veronica Calvin
  • Problem with fungi or parasites – Freddie Poole
  • Glucose problem – Pat Bernhardt
  • POC problem – Arleen Pinkos, Carol Benson
  • Coagulation problems – Josie Bautista
7
Organizational Ownership -- subject specific work
  • TDM problem – Avis Danishefsky
  • Instrument problem – Jim Callaghan
  • Software algorithm problem – Mary Pastel
  • Cytology problem – Louise Magruder, Max Robinowitz
  • Genetics problem – Joe Hackett, Bob Becker, Maria Chan
  • Etc.
8
What Works
  • Knowledge management
  • Information dissemination occurs
  • At stand-ups
  • At division meetings
  • At management meetings
  • Through teams organized to address issues – very product specific feedback assured
  • At lunch, the men’s (women’s) room, etc.
9
Tools That Work Well -- Recalls
  • Rapid dissemination of 48 hour notices
  • Real time communication and  meetings
  • Nuanced expertise brought to bear (6 medical officers, a plethora of lab, industry, research scientists)
  • Reviewers automatically included in important work
  • Result in concrete actions


10
Recalls
  • 2005
  • Class 1 – 6
  • Class 2 – 28
  • Class 3 – 44
  • Average days – 10 to 16
11
Recalls
  • 2006
  • Class 1 – 1
  • Class 2 – 28
  • Class 3 – 24
  • Average days – 4 to 6
12
Recalls
  • Result in knowledge gathering
  • MDR analysis
  • Literature reviews
  • Professional outreach
  • Changes in inspection plan; identification of problem players - MDR issue, general quality issue; total system failure
  • Changes in inspection quality – briefings for inspectors or participation in inspections
13
Tools That Work Well – Ad hoc signals and risk communication
  • Government partners
  • CDC vancomycin resistant strep; Lyme disease problem;  – MMWR, CDC panel,  labeling changes, OCI investigation
  • New York State – unapproved breath test, compliance letter
  • CMS – Labotech Investigation


14
Tools That Work Well – Ad hoc signals and risk communication
  • Trade Complaints
  • High profile, high risk compliance letters to
  • Roche (AmpliChip)
  • Correlogics
  • Natural link to pre-IDE; many follow-up meetings are joint
15
Tools That Work Well – Ad hoc signals and risk communication
  • Consumer Complaints
  • Strong tie to DSMICA for product specific queries; review staff learn what is being asked
  • Compliance letters when unauthorized marketing is identified
  • Providing information to CMS when FDA authority is limited
  • Laboratory safety tips


16
Patient Safety Communications
  • FDA Reminds Healthcare Professionals About Falsely Elevated Glucose Levels
  • FDA Issues a Public Message Regarding Drugs of Abuse Tests
  • FDA Issues a Public Message on LifeScan Blood Glucose Meters
  • Nationwide Alert on B-Sure Pregnancy Tests
17
Patient Safety Communications
  • FDA Warns Consumers Not to Use Home-Use Diagnostic Kits Marketed by Globus Media
  • Troponin:  What Laboratorians Should Know to Manage Elevated Results
  • Blood Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) Assays: What Laboratorians Should Know About False Positive Results
  • Cautions in Using Rapid Tests for Detecting Influenza A
18
Industry Communications
  • Warning letters – 2
  • Untitled letters – 2
  • It has come to our attention letter – 15
  • Other letters – 14


19
The Verdict Is Still Out -- MDRs
  • Chemistry products are looked at by two chemists
  • Hematology products by a hematologist
  • Immunology products by an immunologist
  • Microbiology products by a microbiologist
  • Pathology products by someone with expertise in histopathology


20
MDR’s – FY 2006
  • Death – 16
  • Injury – 1325
  • Malfunction - 2554
  • Other - 416
  • Total -- 4314
21
The Verdict Is Still Out
  • MDRs
  • issues with quality of data and denominators
  • Unsure if flecks of gold in the coal mine or if more fool’s gold then real


  • LabSun/LabNet
  • LabSun pilot during summer of 2003 – several interesting signals followed by fatigue
  • Current plan to re-visit and re-focus (LabNet)
22
What Doesn’t Work Well
  • Cataloguing of work and formalization of risk assessment
  • Uncertain impact of feedback on premarket
  • Poor connection to real world labs (not that we haven’t tried) – general reporting confusion (labs and companies)


23
One Clear Conclusion
  • QSRs RULE
  • Make most scientific sense as a basis for regulation – not equivalency but quality, verification, validation, control
  • Connect to real world experience
  • Result in clear regulatory actions


24
OIVD
  • Surprising ongoing learning curve
  • Untapped opportunities
  • Come a long way
  • Journey is not over
25
"Thank You"

  • Thank You


  • Donald St.Pierre
  • don.st.pierre@fda.hhs.gov
  • Ph. (240) 276-0484
  • Fax (240) 276-0664
  • www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd